The WNBA is gaining attention for all the wrong reasons, especially as of late. However, despite those issues, the league continues to bring in more viewership, revenue, attendance and intrigue. This past weekend, Ric Bucher added another layer to the WNBA's attention-grabbing news cycle. The former ESPN NBA **** yst raised a question that many people have asked privately within their own circles of friends: Why are all the color **** ysts and studio hosts on national WNBA broadcasts women?
Unfortunately for Bucher, his question is nothing new. It's the same question people have been asking about women in the NFL, MLB and nearly every other major sport for generations. But Bucher's context for asking the question is where the real debate and questions lie.
As much as people love a good headline, this isn't a debate about men versus women on WNBA broadcasts. It's a conversation more about how networks approach controversial topics surrounding the games and leagues themselves.
If you look at the totality of Bucher's words, his argument wasn't centered around that the WNBA doesn't include men. His argument was that the women in the roles they currently hold are too protective of the league itself.
"Is the WNBA not worthy of being discussed and dissected by a variety of voices and perspectives in the same way the NBA is? There are some smart basketball-savvy women, both in the studio and the broadcast booth, but I don't hear a whole lot of differing opinion or debate. It all comes off as safe and monotone and cookie cutter, especially when it comes to controversial topics," said Bucher.

#WNBA #attention #league #studio